{"id":2719,"date":"2013-03-20T12:56:24","date_gmt":"2013-03-20T01:56:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/australiansforhonestpolitics.wordpress.com\/?p=2719"},"modified":"2019-04-13T23:24:18","modified_gmt":"2019-04-13T13:24:18","slug":"perrett-urges-afp-to-investigate-ashby-now-adds-abetz-to-list","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/perrett-urges-afp-to-investigate-ashby-now-adds-abetz-to-list\/","title":{"rendered":"Perrett urges AFP to investigate #Ashby now, adds Abetz to list"},"content":{"rendered":"[clear]\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Negus\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nofibs.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Negus.jpg?resize=600%2C400\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<p>By\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/australiansforhonestpolitics.wordpress.com\/margo-kingston\/\">Margo Kingston<br \/>\n<\/a><span style=\"color: #333333;\">March 20, 2013<\/span><\/p>\n<p>EXCLUSIVE<\/p>\n<p>Graham Perrett has written to the AFP demanding it resume its investigation into possible criminal activity surrounding the court action by James Ashby against the then Speaker of the House of Representatives Peter Slipper.<\/p>\n<p>He has also added Liberal Senator Eric Abetz to \u00a0the list of people the AFP should investigate for possible involvement in an alleged conspiracy to abuse the judicial system to bring down the government, referring to an email provided by a member of the public.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/R_t0XIAw678?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;start=38&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/p>\n<p>On <a href=\"http:\/\/australianpolitics.com\/downloads\/2012\/12-12-21_graham-perrett-letter-to-afp.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">December 21 last year<\/a> Mr Perrett referred Mal Brough, Christopher Pyne, Julie Bishop, James Ashby and Karen Doane to the AFP.<\/p>\n<p>On February 14, the <a href=\"\/\/www.independentaustralia.net\/Wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/AFPLetter.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">AFP said by letter<\/a> it would not investigate until Mr Ashby\u2019s application for leave to appeal, to be heard in May, was finalised.<\/p>\n<p>The appeal concerns the correctness of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au\/judgments\/Judgments\/fca\/single\/2012\/2012fca1411\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Justice Rares dismissal of Mr Ashby\u2019s case<\/a> as an abuse of Court process. It does not concern any criminal activity before the case was lodged in Court, including<a href=\"http:\/\/marshallchambers.weebly.com\/1\/post\/2013\/02\/criminal-law-mal-brough-and-ashbygate.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> the alleged theft of Mr Slipper diary<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Perrett told AFHP: \u2018This is not a situation for caution &#8211; this is a process that can only benefit by speed in investigation because the days are counting down to an election in which the good character of the players is a big issue. Time is of the essence and the investigation of possible criminal offences is completely different to the issue in the appeal.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>\u2018When Mr Brough opens a campaign office two doors down from Mr Slipper that is a statement by the Liberal Party that Mr Brough has done nothing wrong. I believe he is a conspirator in an plan to bring down the elected government and that he has no respect for our democratic institutions.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Letter from Graham Perrett MP to AFP Commissioner Mr Tony Negus<!--more--><\/span><br \/>\n19 March 2013<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr Tony Negus<br \/>\nCommissioner<br \/>\nAustralian Federal Police<br \/>\nGPO Box 401<br \/>\nCANBERRA ACT 2601<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dear Tony,<\/p>\n<p><strong>Re: Conspiracy against Peter Slipper and Potential Commission of Criminal Offences<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. I refer to a letter from Commander Errol Raiser dated 14th February 2013 received by<br \/>\nmy office on 26th February 2013 wherein the Australian Federal Police states that it<br \/>\nwill \u2018suspend its evaluation of the matter\u2019 until after the outcome of the appeal by<br \/>\nMr James Ashby\u2019s lawyer Mr Michael Harmer \u2018has been finalised\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>2. Commander Raiser advises that this evaluation of allegations that the Honourable<br \/>\nMal Brough {\u201cMr Brough\u201d), the Honourable Christopher Pyne MP (\u201cMr Pyne\u201d), the<br \/>\nHonourable Julie Bishop MP (\u201cMs Bishop\u201d), Queensland Minister the Honourable<br \/>\nMark McArdle (\u201cMr McArdle\u201d) or Ms Karen Doane (\u201cMs Doane\u201d) were engaged in a<br \/>\ncriminal conspiracy to destroy Peter Slipper and bring down the Federal<br \/>\nGovernment, will at the very least be delayed until after the Leave to Appeal is heard<br \/>\nby the Federal Court on the scheduled date of 30th May 2013.<\/p>\n<p>3. In my submission, it is neither appropriate nor desirable for evaluation of the<br \/>\ncriminal allegations against Mr Brough and others to be unnecessarily delayed while<br \/>\nthis appeal is resolved. Not only because the full resolution of this matter could<br \/>\npotentially be very lengthy, but primarily because the task to be undertaken by the<br \/>\nFull Bench of the Federal Court is completely different from the work ofthe<br \/>\nAustralian Federal Police in investigating any criminal conduct arising from Mr<br \/>\nAshby\u2019s now discredited allegations against Mr Slipper. Consequently it is therefore<br \/>\nessential for the Australian Federal Police investigation to continue independently of<br \/>\nthe progression, or not, of the appeal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>4. At the time of writing I note that on 11th January 2013 Mr James Ashby\u2019s lawyer Mr<br \/>\nScott Freidman of Harris Freidman lawyers applied for leave to appeal the judgement<br \/>\nof Justice Rares. Furthermore, I note that on 14th January 2013, Mr Ashby\u2019s former<br \/>\nlawyer also filed an application for leave to appeal Justice Rares\u2019 judgment but did so<br \/>\nin his own right and without any instructions from Mr Ashby.<\/p>\n<p>5. It is my understanding that the 30th May 2013 is actually the scheduled date for the<br \/>\ncosts hearing in the original Slipper matter (Federal Court reference: NSD580\/2012)<br \/>\nand that the Harmer and Ashby leave matters (Federal Court references:<br \/>\nNSD22\/2013 and NSD31\/2013) are scheduled to be heard by the full federal court by<br \/>\ntheir honours Mansfield, Siopis and Gilmore on the 2nd May 2013 and 3rd May 2013.<\/p>\n<p>6. At the time of writing, the Federal Court Registry has not received any application<br \/>\nfrom Mr Brough, Mr Pyne, Ms Bishop, Mr McArdle or Ms Doane seeking leave to<br \/>\nappeal the judgement of Justice Rares.<\/p>\n<p>7. As I detailed in my letter dated 20th December 2012, I sought an immediate<br \/>\ninvestigation into whether Mr Brough, Mr Pyne, Ms Bishop, Mr McArdle, Mr Ashby<br \/>\nand Ms Doane had committed criminal offences in relation to their participation in a<br \/>\npolitical conspiracy designed to harm the Honourable Peter Slipper MP and the<br \/>\nFederal Government, as laid out in the Federal Court decision dated 12th December<br \/>\n2012 by Justice Rares.<\/p>\n<p>8. The Full Bench of the Federal Court will be asked to review the trial judgment and<br \/>\ndetermine whether His Honour Justice Rares erred in finding that Mr Ashby\u2019s<br \/>\nallegations against Mr Slipper were brought for a collateral political purpose and not<br \/>\nto ventilate any legitimate legal complaint. The Court will base its review on<br \/>\nevidence and argument that was relied upon by the parties to the original claim,<br \/>\ntogether with any new material that the parties may place before the Court. The<br \/>\nappeal will be resolved as between the parties to the proceeding, Mr Slipper and Mr<br \/>\nAshby, and will determine their rights and liabilities according to principles of civil<br \/>\nlaw.<\/p>\n<p>9. As Mr Ashby is the only one of the aforementioned parties who has sought leave to<br \/>\nappeal Justice Rares\u2019 decision, I ask you to reconsider the decision by the Australian<br \/>\nFederal Police to suspend evaluation of this very serious matter for at least several<br \/>\nmonths. Moreover, in light of the seriousness of the findings of fact in Justice Rares\u2019<br \/>\nDecember 2012 decision, there is an argument that the time for \u201ceva luating\u201d has<br \/>\nlong since passed and that in the interests of justice, investigations should now be<br \/>\nadvanced expeditiously.<\/p>\n<p>10. I repeat the fact that in Justice Rares\u2019 decision he reached a \u201cfirm conclusion\u201d that<br \/>\nthe \u201cpredominant purpose\u201d of Mr Ashby\u2019s sexual harassment claim against Mr<br \/>\nSlipper was to \u201cpursue a political attack against Mr Slipper\u201d designed to \u201ctip the<br \/>\nGovernment to Mal\u2019s (Brough] and the LNP\u2019s advantage\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>11. It is my submission to you that the role of the Australian Federal Police in<br \/>\ninvestigating the criminal allegations which I raised with Commissioner Negus in<br \/>\nDecember 2012 is completely different, and it is appropriate that this continue<br \/>\nindependently of the civil appeal.<\/p>\n<p>12. The Australian Federal Police possesses investigative powers to inquire into the<br \/>\nallegations I have raised and determine whether the individuals referred to in my<br \/>\ncorrespondence, or anybody else, has committed any criminal offences. My referral<br \/>\nrelates to a much broader group of people than those involved in the civil<br \/>\nproceedings currently before the Federal Court, and is supported by a much broader<br \/>\nrange of evidence to that which will be considered by the Court as it conducts its<br \/>\nappeal hearing. However, the Australian Federal Police will form a view about the<br \/>\nlawfulness of the conduct of Mr Brough and others based on the principles of<br \/>\ncriminal law.<\/p>\n<p>13. Nothing arising in the civil appeal can fetter the powers of the Australian Federal<br \/>\nPolice in identifying whether any criminal offences have been committed, and<br \/>\nwhether any such offences should be referred to the Commonwealth Director of<br \/>\nPublic Prosecutions for prosecution. As well, nothing arising in the Australian<br \/>\nFederal Police investigation can possibly prejudice the conduct of the appeal before<br \/>\nthe Full Federal Court. In all these circumstances, it is neither appropriate nor<br \/>\ndesirable to postpone evaluation ofthe very serious criminal allegations contained<br \/>\nwithin my referral, and the better course of conduct is to proceed immediately with<br \/>\nevaluation of those criminal allegations.<\/p>\n<p>14. Whilst I recognise the caution behind the Australian Federal Police\u2019s decision to wait<br \/>\nthree months before you recommence your evaluations, I also wish to stress the<br \/>\npressing seriousness of this whole matter; the risks associated with any delay; and<br \/>\nthe benefits of your officers investigating in a t imely manner.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SIGNIFICANCE OF INVESTIGATION <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>15. The conspiracy and accompanying behaviour towards Mr Slipper could constitute<br \/>\ncausing him harm in his capacity as a Commonwealth public official, contrary to<br \/>\ns147.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (\u201cthe Criminal Code\u201d) and all the<br \/>\naforementioned involved parties other than Mr Ashby may still be liable as either<br \/>\nprincipals or accessories pursuant to Part 2.4 of the Criminal Code (Extension of<br \/>\ncriminal responsibility).<\/p>\n<p>16. Mr Brough\u2019s unauthorised access to Mr Slipper\u2019s official diary might be classified as<br \/>\nconduct classified as unauthorised access to restricted data contrary to s478.1 of the<br \/>\nCriminal Code, and unauthorised disclosure of information by Commonwealth<br \/>\nofficers contrary to s70 ofthe Crimes Act 1914.<\/p>\n<p>17. There are serious penalties attached to the abovementioned crimes. As Mr Pyne<br \/>\nand Ms Bishop are serving members of parliament; Mr McArdle a Minister of the<br \/>\nCrown in Queensland; and Mr Brough is currently a federa l candidate, any possible<br \/>\nor potential criminality on their part is of especial significance and would have<br \/>\nramifications for the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth parliament<br \/>\nand the makeup of the government of Queensland.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>18. I also refer to the additional information sent to my office by a member of the public<br \/>\nand subsequently provided to the Australian Federal Police by my office via email<br \/>\nregarding Mr Pyne\u2019s suggested involvement in the conspiracy. The email referred to<br \/>\na Liberal-National Party fundraising event on the Sunshine Coast where the principal<br \/>\nguest was the Leader of the Coalition in the Senate, Senator the Honourable Eric<br \/>\nAbetz.<\/p>\n<p>19. I note from Justice Rares decision that Mr Ashby engaged in an exchange of SMS<br \/>\nmessages with Ms Peta Simpson on 3rd February 2012, which indicates that Mr<br \/>\nAshby had agreed to the \u201cdeal\u201d discussed with Mr McArdle. Ms Simpson is a senior<br \/>\nSunshine Coast member of the Liberal-National Party and a close associate of the<br \/>\nLeader of the Coalition in the Senate, Senator the Honourable Eric Abetz.<\/p>\n<p>20. Shortly after Mr Pyne\u2019s meetings with Mr Ashby in late March 2012, on or around 4th<br \/>\nApril 2012, Senator the Hon. Eric Abetz, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate,<br \/>\nvisited the Sunshine Coast and met with Ms Peta Simpson. Ms Simpson appears to<br \/>\nhave been in regular contact with Mr Ashby about the \u201cdeal\u201d he had been offered by<br \/>\nLiberal-National Party figures in exchange for bringing the sexual harassment claim<br \/>\nagainst Mr Slipper.<\/p>\n<p>21. Therefore, Mr Abetz\u2019s role in the conspiracy, along with the aforementioned parties<br \/>\nalso should be investigated in a timely manner to determine whether any criminal<br \/>\noffences have occurred, and to subsequently refer the matter to the Director of<br \/>\nPublic Prosecutions, where appropriate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>RISKS OF DELAY <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>22. There are significant risks associated with any delay because of the possibility of the<br \/>\ndestruction of diaries, computer hard drives and any other incriminating<br \/>\ndocumentation associated with the preparation and planning of the conspiracy.<\/p>\n<p>23. In my submission, time is of the essence. Not only might delay lead to the<br \/>\ndestruction or disappearance of vital evidence it is important that the Australian<br \/>\nFederal Police investigation is resolved prior to the September 14 Federal election. If<br \/>\nMr Brough, Mr Pyne or Ms Bishop are to be charged, this should announced well in<br \/>\nadvance of the election, to allow the Liberal National Party to consider their preselection<br \/>\nand to allow the electors of their seats to cast a fully informed ballot. If Mr<br \/>\nBrough, Mr Pyne or Ms Bishop are charged, and later convicted, of any offence<br \/>\npunishable by more than 12 months imprisonment, they would be disqualified from<br \/>\nsitting as a Member of the House of Representatives by operation of s 44(ii) of the<br \/>\nAustralian Constitution. It is essential that these possibilities are resolved prior to<br \/>\nthe election, in the interests of the electors of Fisher, Sturt and Curtin.<\/p>\n<p>24. As there are less than six months until the scheduled date for the next federal<br \/>\nelection and both Mr Slipper and Mr Brough are candidates for the same federal<br \/>\nseat, it is only fair that both the Australian public and the voters of Fisher know if<br \/>\nthere is likely to be any criminal charges brought against their candidates.<\/p>\n<p>25. Furthermore, I am advised that Mr Brough has opened his campaign office only two<br \/>\ndoors away from Mr Slipper\u2019s electorate office. This can only be interpreted by the<br \/>\nvoters of Fisher as a deliberate and provocative act by Mr Brough.<\/p>\n<p>26. Furthermore, I am advised that local schools and community groups have not invited<br \/>\nMr Slipper to events in his electorate because he is under investigation. However,<br \/>\non the other hand, they have invited Mr Brough to local events because he is a<br \/>\ncandidate. Any delay in resolving the investigation into the conspiracy only further<br \/>\nhampers Mr Sl ipper\u2019s ability to represent his electorate and fairly present his bona<br \/>\nfides to the electorate of Fisher on the 14th September 2013.<\/p>\n<p>27. Justice would dictate that the names of both candidates for the next election must<br \/>\nbe investigated and cleared, in a timely manner.<\/p>\n<p>28. I also wish to take this opportunity to bring to your attention further compelling<br \/>\nevidence which links the highest echelons of the Federal Coa lition to the conspiracy<br \/>\nto destroy Mr Sl ipper and bring down the Federal Government. In my original<br \/>\ncorrespondence to Commissioner Negus, I noted that it was possible the \u201cMurray\u201d<br \/>\nreferred to repeatedly in text messages between Mr Ashby and Ms Doane was in<br \/>\nfact Mr Murray Hansen, long-time Chief of Staff to Julie Bishop, Deputy Leader of the<br \/>\nOpposition. In that correspondence, I noted that Mr Hansen had well established<br \/>\nlinks with the Sunshine Coast, and was rumored to be friends with Peta Simpson, the<br \/>\nSunshine Coast Liberal and National Party Branch Member and former Liberal and<br \/>\nNational Party pre-selection candidate for the Federal Seat of Fisher.<\/p>\n<p>29. Is there any evidence in the mainstream or social media which supports or<br \/>\nestablishes any links or friendship between Mr Hansen and Ms Simpson? You will<br \/>\nrecall that Ms Simpson was apparently central in negotiating the \u201cdeal\u201d that Mr<br \/>\nAshby and Ms Doane would be offered by the Liberal and National Party to<br \/>\nparticipate in the conspiracy against Mr Slipper. Mr Hansen has had a long-time role<br \/>\nas an adviser to the Federal Coalition and has well established links with the<br \/>\nSunshine Coast and South East Queensland. In my opinion, the Australian Federal<br \/>\nPolice should concentrate investigations to determine whether the \u201cMurray\u201d<br \/>\nreferred to by Mr Asbhy and Ms Doane as an avenue to employment with the<br \/>\nFederal Coalition as part of the \u201cdeal\u201d offered to them to participate in the<br \/>\nconspiracy to bring down the Government, was in fact Mr Murray Hansen.<\/p>\n<p><strong>CONCLUSION <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30. In the interests of efficiency, timeliness and thoroughness it would be strategic to<br \/>\ncommence investigations into Mr Pyne, Ms Bishop, Mr McArdle, Mr Abetz, Ms<br \/>\nSimpson and Mr Brough, while at the same time leaving aside Mr Ashby\u2019s role in the<br \/>\nmatter until after the Federal Court has made a decision as to whether his leave to<br \/>\nappeal will be granted.<\/p>\n<p>31. Consequently, I again ask the Australian Federal Police to urgently conduct a formal<br \/>\ninvestigation to determine whether Mr Brough, Ms Bishop, Mr Pyne, Mr McArdle,<br \/>\nMs Doane, Eric Abetz, and\/or any others, have committed any criminal offences. I<br \/>\nask the Australian Federal Police to prepare a Brief of Evidence for referral to the<br \/>\nDirector of Public Prosecutions {DPP), if appropriate.<br \/>\n32. I would urge the Australian Federal Police to proceed with its investigation<br \/>\nimmediately, especially given the risk of disappearance of vital evidence and<br \/>\nrelevance to the choice faced by electors in Fisher, Sturt and Curtin at the imminent<br \/>\nFederal Election.<\/p>\n<p>33. Undoubtedly, because of the political nature of this case, there has been significant<br \/>\nmedia and public interest in the Australian Federal Police\u2019s handling of this case.<br \/>\nWhilst I only seek justice in this matter, I am also very well aware that I write to you<br \/>\nas member of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party Caucus at a time of highly<br \/>\ncharged political circumstances whilst there is a minority government. Nevertheless,<br \/>\nI will continue to make our correspondence available to the public and the media,<br \/>\nunless you request otherwise with good reason. However, I also give an undertaking<br \/>\nto not reveal the names of any individual Australian Federal Police officers who<br \/>\nprogress this matter. I assume that they too would not wish to be harangued and<br \/>\nharassed by members of the public and media who are interested in the progress of<br \/>\nthis important investigation.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you once again for taking the time to investigate this very serious matter.<\/p>\n<p>Yours sincerely,<\/p>\n<p><strong>Graham Perrett MP <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Federal Member for Moreton<\/p>\n<p><strong>CC Commander Errol Raiser<br \/>\nManager Special References<br \/>\nGPO Box 401<br \/>\nCANBERRA CITY ACT 2601<\/strong><\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[clear] By\u00a0Margo Kingston March 20, 2013 EXCLUSIVE Graham Perrett has written to the AFP demanding it resume its investigation into possible criminal activity surrounding the court action by James Ashby against the then Speaker of the House of Representatives Peter Slipper. He has also added Liberal Senator Eric Abetz to \u00a0the list of people the [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[3434,59,26],"tags":[96,113,116,125,243,302,472],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3t0mw-HR","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2719"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.nofibs.com.au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}