![\"20160908-arena-solar-projects-funding-feature\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nofibs.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/20160908-ARENA-solar-projects-funding-feature.jpg?resize=800%2C400\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) is facing a huge funding cut of $1.2 billion as part of the budget omnibus the Federal Government wants to pass. It is responsible for providing seed funding for innovative renewable energy projects. The latest funding round has just been released. It features substantial seed funding for 12 major solar projects and builds on innovative seed funding for renewables projects in previous years.<\/p>\n
According to the Guardian<\/a>, “The only time in Australia\u2019s recent history that research and development for renewables outstripped R&D for fossil fuels was when the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Arena) began making grants to renewables in 2013, the study of International Energy Agency figures found.” The research and development funding disparity has been investigated by the International Energy Agency. Here is Ben Oquist from the Australia Institute<\/a> on this disparity:<\/p>\n \n\u201cAustralia has a long history of prioritising fossil fuels over renewables in R&D funding. ARENA turned this around, briefly making Australia a world leader in renewables,\u201d Executive Director of The Australia Institute, Ben Oquist said.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile the Olympics results may have disappointed some sports fans, Australia\u2019s renewable energy R&D performance has made the podium just once since 1979 \u2013 and that was thanks to ARENA, which the government now wants to abolish<\/p>\n \u201cWorse still, our precious R&D dollars have been flowing into fossil fuels. As well as funding to coal and gas, more than $1.1 billion has gone into carbon capture and storage.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile the long promised CCS technology is still far from a reality, renewables dominate new power generation globally.<\/p>\n \u201cAustralia’s research and development funding should be aimed at industries of the future.<\/p>\n \u201cAbolishing ARENA’s grant funding will send Australia back towards the bottom of the international pack in terms renewable energy funding.<\/p>\n \u201cBut Government plans to cut ARENA\u2019s funding while providing new funds for fossil fuel R&D risks putting Australia back decades in energy R&D,\u201d Oquist said.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Comparison of public Research and Development funding in Australia for Fossil Fuels and Renewables<\/p><\/div>\n The current funding round might very well be the organisations last, if the Federal Government has it’s way. Slashing the agency’s funds would be tantamount to abolition of the agency. The Abbott Government sought to abolish the agency but were stymied in the Senate by the crossbench. <\/p>\n The Greens and Nick Xenophon Team have both made media statements that they would block the present ARENA funding cut in the Senate. So it comes down to whether Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and the Labor Party will step up and block the cuts to the agency.<\/p>\n \n"Clean energy workers are deeply concerned about the cuts to ARENA" – @mikecollo<\/a> from @CSIROStaff<\/a> #saveARENA<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/GxfC0nmDQc<\/a><\/p>\n — AYCC (@AYCC) September 12, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/p>\n![\"Comparison](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nofibs.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/20160912-TAI-RD-funding-fossilfuel-vs-renewables.jpg?resize=617%2C363\")
\n